Which of the following actions could indicate wrongful intent in insider trading?

The selection of knowing or reckless actions regarding nonpublic information is indicative of wrongful intent in insider trading because it highlights the understanding or disregard by an individual of their obligation to maintain confidentiality regarding that information. When someone knowingly trades based on information that is not publicly available, or does so with reckless indifference to whether that information is confidential, it reflects an intention to benefit unlawfully from a material advantage. This behavior demonstrates a clear violation of securities laws and ethical standards, as it undermines market integrity and investor trust.

In contrast, accidental sharing of information does not imply any malicious intent, as it suggests an unintended breach of confidentiality rather than a deliberate choice to misuse nonpublic information. Filing mandatory reports is a legal requirement that indicates compliance with regulatory expectations, not wrongdoing. Engaging in personal finance education is unrelated to insider trading and indicates a focus on knowledge dissemination rather than participating in illicit trading activities. Thus, knowing or reckless actions regarding nonpublic information represent a clear violation of duties associated with insider information, establishing a foundation for wrongful intent.